Log in

For investors & foundations

Assess opportunities with the criteria that matter to you.

Apply your investment, due-diligence, grant, or evaluation criteria consistently, without repeating the same research for every opportunity.

The real problem is volume and consistency

Same criteria. Different conclusions.

Every opportunity arrives with a stack of reports, disclosures, and applications. Reading them all, the same way, every time, is where good processes quietly break down.

  • Two analysts read the same disclosure and reach different conclusions.
  • The fifteenth grant application gets less attention than the first.
  • The reasoning lives in a researcher’s notes, not in a record your team can check.

See the evidence behind the result

Every result traces back to its source.

For each assessment, your team can trace a result back to the supporting evidence and source. So when someone asks “Why did we reach this conclusion?”, the reasoning doesn’t disappear into a spreadsheet or a researcher’s notes.

Bring your own criteria

Your criteria, applied the same way every time.

Use the framework your team already relies on, such as an investment thesis, due-diligence framework, grant criteria, sustainability or governance requirements, and apply it identically to every opportunity, instead of starting from scratch each time.

  • Investment thesis

    What you look for, and what rules an opportunity out.

  • Due-diligence framework

    The questions every company or project must answer.

  • Grant criteria

    What an application must demonstrate to qualify.

  • Sustainability requirements

    The standards and disclosures you expect.

  • Governance criteria

    How an organization is run and held accountable.

  • Scorecard

    Your own weighting and rating approach.

Your criteria define the assessment.

Compare before you decide

See opportunities side by side.

Bring assessments together to compare companies, projects, applicants, or portfolio organizations on the criteria your team defined.

The goal isn’t to replace judgment with a score. It’s to give your judgment better information.

Built for different decisions

Start where the volume is highest.

  • Investment decisions

    Screen potential investments against your thesis before committing analyst time. Surface what is supported, what is missing, and what rules an opportunity out.

  • Due diligence

    Structure the review of a company, fund, or project against your framework, with each answer tied to the document it came from.

  • Grant decisions

    Apply the same evaluation criteria to every application.

  • Portfolio review

    Reassess organizations over time.

  • Thematic research

    Assess a group against common questions.

Your team makes the call

AI handles the repeatable research. You make the decision.

Lucid Axon prepares the assessment so your team can focus on interpretation, discussion, and judgment. Review the results. Challenge the evidence. Apply your expertise.

The decision remains yours.

Is Lucid Axon a fit?

Do you evaluate multiple opportunities using your own criteria?

You have a defined approach.

An investment thesis, evaluation framework, due-diligence criteria, or scorecard.

You assess repeatedly.

You apply that approach to multiple companies, projects, organizations, or applications.

You have a decision to make.

Your assessment informs an investment, grant, selection, monitoring, or other decision.

Lucid Axon can help you scale the assessment behind that decision.

Free pilot

See your own criteria in action.

Share a framework your team already uses and choose five opportunities. We’ll run the assessment and show you the results alongside your current process.

Your framework and results stay private to your team.

  1. 1

    Share your criteria

    A framework, scorecard, questionnaire, or other approach your team already uses.

  2. 2

    Choose five opportunities

    Companies, projects, organizations, or applications.

  3. 3

    Compare the results

    See what changes when the repetitive research is handled by AI.